Skip to main content

Germany’s social media law may force Facebook to be judge, jury, and executioner of free speech

The German government’s controversial new law, which aims to crack down on hate speech on internet platforms, comes into force today (Oct 1). But while it seems like a progressive step towards combatting this issue, there are concerns that the move could lead to excessive censorship due to the level of fines social media platforms face.

Passed earlier this summer, the law will financially penalize social media platforms, like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, if they don’t remove hate speech—as per its definition in Germany’s current criminal code—within 24 hours. They will be allowed up to a week to decide for comments that don’t fall into the blatant hate speech category. The top fine for not deleting hate speech within 24 hours is €50 million ($59 million)—though that would be for repeatedly breaking the law, not for individual cases.

The hope is that the prospect of eye-watering fines will force the social media giants to tackle the problem, something they promised and have spectacularly failed to do in Germany. Justice Minister Heiko Mass said in June that “online platforms are not taking adequate action. Our experience has clearly shown that without political pressure, the social networks will unfortunately not budge,”

However, journalists, lawyers, and free-speech advocates have been voicing their concerns about the new law for months. They say that, to avoid fines, Facebook and others will err on the side of caution and just delete swathes of comments, including ones that are not illegal. They worry that social media platforms are being given the power to police and effectively shut down people’s right to free opinion and free speech in Germany.

The German Journalists Association (DJV) is calling on journalists and media organizations to start documenting all deletions of their posts on social media as of today. “The borders of free speech must not be allowed to be drawn by profit-driven businesses,” said DJV chairman Frank Überall in a recent statement.

Reporters Without Borders also expressed their strong opposition to the law when it was drafted in May, saying it would “contribute to the trend to privatize censorship by delegating the duties of judges to commercial online platforms… as if the internet giants can replace independent and impartial courts.”

Joachim Steinhöfel, a media attorney in Germany, told Quartz there was “no reason for this law, as there are no new penal codes in the regulation.” The huge penalties are completely out of proportion compared to those faced by traditional media in Germany, he says. The maximum penalty imposed on German print, television or radio for airing or printing illegal content is €250,000.

“Social media is a hub for third parties,” he said. “Even prior to this new law, social media was not a law free-zone. Facebook, Twitter et. al. are liable, by civil and criminal law, from the moment they become aware of the content.”

While Steinhöfel agrees that the state needs to do something to make Facebook take responsibility for the proliferation of hate speech on their platforms, he says ultimately it’s the legal system’s responsibility—and it can and has to deal with it.

Quartz http://ift.tt/2xP92Iw October 01, 2017 at 10:40AM

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Solving Van der Pol equation with ivp_solve

Van der Pol’s differential equation is The equation describes a system with nonlinear damping, the degree of damping given by μ. If μ = 0 the system is linear and undamped, but for positive μ the system is nonlinear and damped. We will plot the phase portrait for the solution to Van der Pol’s equation in Python using SciPy’s new ODE solver ivp_solve . The function ivp_solve does not solve second-order systems of equations directly. It solves systems of first-order equations, but a second-order differential equation can be recast as a pair of first-order equations by introducing the first derivative as a new variable. Since y is the derivative of x , the phase portrait is just the plot of ( x , y ). If μ = 0, we have a simple harmonic oscillator and the phase portrait is simply a circle. For larger values of μ the solutions enter limiting cycles, but the cycles are more complicated than just circles. Here’s the Python code that made the plot. from scipy import linspace from ...

Lawyer: 'Socialite Grifter' Anna Sorokin 'Had To Do It Her Way' (And Steal $275,000)

Opening statements were made in the "Socialite Grifter" trial on Wednesday, and both sides provided extremely different reasons why Anna Sorokin allegedly scammed a number of people and institutions out of $275,000. [ more › ] Gothamist https://ift.tt/2HXgI0E March 29, 2019 at 12:33AM

5 Massively Important AI Features In Time Tracking Applications

Artificial intelligence has transformed the future of many industries. One area that has been under- investigated is the use of AI in time tracking technology. AI is Fundamentally Changing the Future of Time Tracking Technology A time tracking software is a worthy investment irrespective of the size of your organization. It generates accurate reports based on the amount of time your team spends working on a task. These reports facilitate planning of budgets for upcoming projects. Many AI tools are changing the nature of time management. MindSync AI discussed the pivotal role of AI in time management in a Medium article . Why is time tracking software important? It helps with keeping track of the hours being invested on a given task. This sheds light on the timeline for the overall project. It also helps in determining the productivity levels of the employees. This is one of the many reasons that AI is driving workplace productivity . But how can employers utilize it effectively? ...